Independents Tracker
Home › Party-line index › Yassamin Ansari

Yassamin Ansari

U.S. Representative, Arizona's 3rd district · Democrat

Votes with the Democratic majority on 99.4% of party-line votes
99.4%
463 of 466 party-line votes
Votes against that majority
3
119th Congress, through Sept. 16, 2026
Rank within party
171st lowest of 219
Among House Democrats with 50+ party-line votes

Yassamin Ansari (D-AZ) voted with the Democratic majority on 99.4% of the 466 party-line votes cast in the 119th Congress through Sept. 16, 2026, and against it 3 times. Among 219 House Democrats with at least 50 such votes, that is the 171st-lowest score. Missed 12 of 674 roll calls (1.8%).

Source: Voteview roll-call data for the 119th Congress (through Sept. 16, 2026), files updated . A party-line vote is one where most voting Democrats opposed most voting Republicans. Voteview profile · Congress.gov

By party

AsPeriodParty-line scoreVotes with own partyWith DemocratsWith RepublicansRank
Democratic Jan. 3, 2025 – Sept. 16, 2026 99.4%463 of 466 99.4%0.6% 171st-lowest of 219 House Democrats

Votes against the Democratic majority

The 3 most recent of 3 party-line votes on which Yassamin Ansari voted against the Democratic majority.

DateMeasureVoteRecord
July 17, 2025H.R. 3633
CLARITY Act
On Passage · Passed
Yea
Democrats: Nay
Official record
Voteview
March 11, 2025H.J.Res. 25
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to “Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales”
On Passage · Passed
Yea
Democrats: Nay
Official record
Voteview
Jan. 9, 2025H.R. 23
Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act
On Passage · Passed
Yea
Democrats: Nay
Official record
Voteview

Embed this

A live badge that updates with the data. Paste it into any web page, newsletter template or README.

Yassamin Ansari party-line score, Independents Tracker

Share

Compare every member · How the score works · Report a correction