Live call
Is behind-the-meter power for data centers ripe?
Blocked on a check since 2026-10-25 · ledger #18
The crossing looks real; the graveyard is asserted at cohort level and must be enumerated before a ripe call.
Short answer
Grid interconnection queues stretch for years while compute demand surges, and stationary storage prices fell sharply in 2025, to about $70/kWh by BloombergNEF's survey as cited in 2026 research. Siting generation and storage at the data center sidesteps the queue. The open check: the companies said to have died trying this in the 2010s, at $400+/kWh storage, are asserted but not yet named.
- Killing constraint
- Storage cost and grid access
E1 Cost curve + E5 Legal permission / regulation - Crossing
- 2025-12
Storage price survey: about $70/kWh, down about 45% in a year (BloombergNEF, as cited in 2026 research).
On-site generation needs cheap storage to be firm, and it is only worth the trouble when grid connection is slow or scarce.
Graveyard
Asserted, not enumerated: the 2026-08-01 research names 'the 2010s microgrid cohort' and demand-response firms. Until named, funded companies that died on storage cost are sourced, this cannot be called ripe.
What changed, dated
- Stationary storage price about $70/kWh, down about 45% year on year (BloombergNEF survey, as cited in the 2026-08-01 research; not independently checked). unlinked M
Dated calls
Each call is written to an append-only, hash-chained ledger before it resolves, with the probability, the date and the rule that decides it.
By 31 December 2027, at least three well-capitalised companies or incumbent programmes have announced, contracted behind-the-meter generation serving third-party compute loads above 20 MW.
Open · resolves 2027-12-31 · registered 2026-10-25 · first stated 2026-08-01
- Resolver
- Manual: Count distinct companies with announced, contracted behind-the-meter generation for third-party compute load above 20 MW. Resolved by a scheduled review that appends the outcome and its evidence to the ledger.
- Falsified if
- Fewer than three such companies on the resolution date.
- Why this probability
- Tests whether the low-occupancy read behind the category is right. Below even odds because the window opened in 2025 and incumbents move slowly on contracted generation.
ledger #4 · 0eaad24b4914e5d4… · verify
Regulatory activity
Federal Register documents matched to this category, refreshed weekly. The dates are what an E5 (legal permission) crossing hangs on.
- Combined Notice of Filings #1
Notice · Energy Department, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission · published 2026-02-27
Related
- Small modular nuclear reactorsTrigger pendingLicensing has crossed; first-of-a-kind cost and commercial operation have not.Killed by: Licensing path and first-of-a-kind cost
- LFP battery cellsFormedEV volume crossed the scale cell makers needed in the mid-2010s.Killed by: Electric-vehicle production volume
- Cloud infrastructure (utility computing)FormedHardware virtualisation matured in 2003; AWS launched S3 and EC2 in 2006.Killed by: Hardware virtualisation